<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Wildlife on The Prosperitist</title>
		<link>https://www.prosperitist.com/tags/wildlife/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Wildlife on The Prosperitist</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		
			<managingEditor>r@raphaelbauer.com (Raphael Bauer)</managingEditor>
		
		
			<webMaster>r@raphaelbauer.com (Raphael Bauer)</webMaster>
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 08:30:00 +0200</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://www.prosperitist.com/tags/wildlife/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>The Polar Bears Nobody Counted</title>
				<link>https://www.prosperitist.com/science/the-polar-bears-nobody-counted/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 08:30:00 +0200</pubDate><author>r@raphaelbauer.com (Raphael Bauer)</author>
				<guid>https://www.prosperitist.com/science/the-polar-bears-nobody-counted/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;The polar bear has a public relations problem in both directions. For two decades it has been the face of the melting Arctic, thin and stranded on a shrinking floe. For almost as long there has been a counter-claim: polar bear numbers have gone &lt;em&gt;up&lt;/em&gt;, not down, four- or fivefold since the 1960s, while the ice retreated the whole time. If the ice is the bears&amp;rsquo; habitat and the ice is going, how can there be more bears?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
